He had a customer on the line last night that had his line provisioned, and his account transferred, for DSL back in July '03.
Every time this customer had called in for technical support, he mentioned he was using a Netcomm 3250 blah blah or something.
Our support team always told him that it was unsupported, and we couldn't help him.
Netcomm tend to manufacture a large array of ADSL products.
The customer has only discovered last night, that he has been using a dial-up modem this entire time.
He never clued in to his line being engaged.
Never clued in to the fact his modem dialled.
Never clued in to the fact the speed hadn't changed, at all.
He blamed it on us for not telling him he needed a new modem, though all of our registration pages and documentation explain as much.
'eres looking at you kid, you're one in a million.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:25 am (UTC)The issue here is a combination of a stupid customer and lazy reps. Never a good mixture. I've seen it plenty of times before at my own place of work. It never fails to shit me up the wall.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:29 am (UTC)Tech : "What modem are you using?"
Them : "Oh, a Netcomm 3250."
Tech : [thinks... unsupported] "I'm sorry sir, we don't provide technical support for that modem."
[give settings, and send them on their way]
He probably hadn't given any information that would suggest it was a dialup, though, I've told you about those lazy fucks at work that fob at first chance.
It'd be very easy to let it slip by.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:35 am (UTC)Or something like that.
I'm not saying this guy can blame you guys for him not reading that he needed an ADSL router, he's obviously not a member of MENSA by a long way. But something as big as that should have been picked up sooner.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:37 am (UTC)(Sorry Scott, can't help it. Heh.)
Though, I guess reps are too eager to blame something on a customer's stupidity. I'm sure he was advised to speak to Netcomm, though didn't. Had he spoken to Netcomm I'm sure they'd have said, hey buddy... you're using a dialup modem. Dickhead.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:49 am (UTC)Kudos to Scott for figuring it out :)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:53 am (UTC)But I am tech god. Haha.
It was funny hearing Scott snivelling about it with the customer on mute.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:55 am (UTC)Like Salacious Crumb?
:P
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:03 am (UTC)Truly it caputres the essence of the subject.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:20 am (UTC)This is why:
Main Entry: [1]spurn
Pronunciation: 'sp&rn
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English spurnan; akin to Old High German spurnan to kick, Latin spernere to spurn, Greek spairein to quiver
Date: before 12th century
intransitive senses
1 : obsolete : a : STUMBLE b : KICK
2 : archaic : to reject something disdainfully
transitive senses
1 : to tread sharply or heavily upon : TRAMPLE
2 : to reject with disdain or contempt : SCORN
synonym see DECLINE
- spurn·er noun
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:27 am (UTC)It sounded wrong to me when I wrote it too.
Spawned wasn't the word I was looking for either.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:30 am (UTC)Spawned is what happens when the lovers get together ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:29 am (UTC)v. tr.
To urge (a horse) on by the use of spurs.
To incite or stimulate: “A business tax cut is needed to spur industrial investment” (New York Times).
That's what I was after.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 01:32 am (UTC)Maybe I should become an English teacher...
or not.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:54 am (UTC)Now we just include the dialup with the account, but all downloads are taken from your download quota for the DSL connection.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 04:20 am (UTC)We have a monopoly here, we like to call it Telstra.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 06:04 am (UTC)Cust rings my ISP: "I'd like to get ADSL!"
Me: "Okies, what's your phone number? Okay, your exchange is approved, let me alert my upstream provider, they'll provision you."
Upstream provider: "Hey, we'd like to insert third-party ADSL codes on this number (0x) xxxx xxxx"
Telstra: "Let's see."
<8 to 21 days later...>
Telstra: "Sorry, we've decided not."
Upstream provider: *marks request negative"
Me: "Sorry, it seems we can't get codes provisioned on your line."
Cust: "Why not?!?"
Me: "I don't know, you'll have to ask Telstra, they regulate the ADSL in this country."
Cust: "Hi Telstra, why couldn't I be provisioned for ADSL? Here's my number."
Telstra: "Oh! We've just ran a scan on your exchange, we'll sign you up for our ADSL! Here's a two-year contract, here's a bevvy of fees, early termination, waivers, AUP, a rental agreement for an extremely shitty ADSL modem, extra charges for Tech Support, and we'll sign you up on an 'unlimited' acct (but you can't download more than 3GB!). Sign on the dotted line, in blood please."
Cust: "Er....."
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 06:37 pm (UTC)Best. Description. Ever.
I fucking hate that though. The Telstra database I have access to gives a 95% accuracy that a line can be provisioned or not. So you got a pretty darn good chance it's right.
Then Telstra say no. Then do what you've already mentioned. It's a fucking joke. That company needs to go down.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 12:40 pm (UTC)it never makes sense to me how the customer doesn't realize what's going on. if you're smart enough to know how to use a dialup connection, but do not know that you consciously ordered and are paying for a dsl connection, then what the heck is your deal?
it's crazy stuff i tell ya
no subject
Date: 2004-02-28 06:39 pm (UTC)The human race is retarded.