The previous talk about users trying to run XP on a too slow computer brought back an amusing memory. A few years ago I worked as an in-house technician at Best Buy (long before they bought Geeksquad). We once had a customer who brought a computer in wanting to upgrade it so he could play I think it was Quake. This was about 8 years ago when a PII/450 was the new hotness and there was much debate if the K6-2 or the PII was a faster CPU.
Anyways, this guy brings his system in inisting on having us upgrade it. It took a bit but I finally managed to convince him that there was no possible way to make that computer play Quake or Quake II maybe. Quake, if you don't recall, would barely play on a 486 and would bring even a Pentium to it's knees pretty handily. This guy was running an old Packard Bell 386sx/16. Sorry, not happening.
Anyways, this guy brings his system in inisting on having us upgrade it. It took a bit but I finally managed to convince him that there was no possible way to make that computer play Quake or Quake II maybe. Quake, if you don't recall, would barely play on a 486 and would bring even a Pentium to it's knees pretty handily. This guy was running an old Packard Bell 386sx/16. Sorry, not happening.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-18 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 11:06 am (UTC)An hour later they wander in with a genuine dumb terminal (not even a Wyse-style terminal), and asked to have a CD-ROM drive fitted to it. Funnily, I never saw them again after telling them it wouldn't be possible...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 11:58 am (UTC)Wolfenstein 3D slowed it down, Doom made it overheat. This guy wanted to play Quake. Riiiiiight.
You should have taken one look at it and said, "I'm sorry, sir, but Quake hasn't been released for the Gameboy."
Had one too.
Date: 2006-08-17 03:55 pm (UTC)Humm I can't remember if you had to use "low quality" mode or not.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-17 01:08 pm (UTC)$3000, including:
1) Labor cost of copying old data over to new PC
2) New PC
"And we'll throw in a new case for free!"
Most things are possible - or at least simulatable - with enough money. At least then they're only arguing over the bill, not their own personal misinterpretation of obscure technical details.
How about Windows XP on a 20 MHz Pentium 1?
Date: 2006-08-18 06:35 am (UTC)Actually, looking through the page, they appear to have gotten it lower still. How about 8 MHz on a Pentium overdrive chip (socket 3 486 board) and only 20 MB of RAM?