[identity profile] spaz-own-joo.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] techrecovery
Would it kill Norton to just adopt one standard user interface across all their home protect-U-from-teh-ebil-intarweb products, so the menu structure for Norton Personal Firewall 2006 at least vaguely resembles the menu structures for Symantec Personal Firewall 2006, Norton Internet Security 2006 and Norton Internet Security 2006 Anti-Spyware Edition?

As far as I can tell, these four products' interfaces were designed by four different people who have never met and have never seen one another's products.

Like, if you just have Norton Internet Security, there's a systray icon you can right-click and "Disable." But if you have Norton Protection Center, there's this whole other baffling array of menus, of which "Norton Internet Security" is a subgroup, along with "AutoProtect" and "Mail Scanning."

but if you just have NIS, "Autoprotect" etc. appear as a subgroup of the NIS menu.

And from what I can tell, both products provide exactly the same set of features.

Date: 2006-05-23 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thecrazyfinn.livejournal.com
It's Norton, the only UI you need to know to fix it is MS's Add/Remove Program's. Worst 'security' software ever.

Date: 2006-05-23 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] methedras.livejournal.com
Hah, I was going to say something to the same effect.

Date: 2006-05-23 11:32 pm (UTC)
jjjiii: It's pug! (Default)
From: [personal profile] jjjiii
Actually, if you do that, you can break your system pretty good. It's better to download the manual removal tools from Symantec. HORRIBLE!!

Re: Grammar Abuse

Date: 2006-05-23 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canthlian.livejournal.com
Five hundred hundred dollar training classes?

Date: 2006-05-23 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jon787.livejournal.com
Thats cause they are written by different people, who probably have never met and might not even work from the same office building. Norton/Symantec, after buying the various tools that are now sold under their brand, never established a UI guide like most other places would do.

Sadly my friend who works for Symantec doesn't work anywhere near the UI area and can't do much.

Date: 2006-05-24 01:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caerleon.livejournal.com
Sadly my friend who works for Symantec doesn't work anywhere near the UI area and can't do much.

You admit to having a *friend* who works for Symantec?.. you can't be much of a friend if you haven't got them out of there.. :-)

Date: 2006-05-24 01:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jon787.livejournal.com
Would this be a bad forum to admit to knowing a Microsoft employee as well?

Date: 2006-05-24 01:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghostdandp.livejournal.com
when the company releases a removal tool for there own software since so many people complain about the fact you can't remove it, you know there's a problem.

I prefer Trend Micro's PC-Cillin myself

Date: 2006-05-24 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jperegrine.livejournal.com
Sadly, the only way I've EVER found to really get rid of it is a reg scrub.

Date: 2006-05-24 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kayfox.livejournal.com
*admits that he works at Microsoft*

Date: 2006-05-24 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jon787.livejournal.com
Its okay, admitting it is the first step to recovery ;)
Page generated Mar. 20th, 2026 03:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios