happy fucken new years....
Jan. 1st, 2006 06:23 amwhy oh why oh why...do people insist that y2k is still gonna happen?
and no... it's no joke. no insult... no trick.
there are people out there that still think in realistic terms that y2k is going to happen.
so there is no problem with me arguing with them as they get further and further drunk... because aparently i know nothing about computers. and these people know what the "experts" say.
i.e. the people on the tv that they worship... gah!
and no... it's no joke. no insult... no trick.
there are people out there that still think in realistic terms that y2k is going to happen.
so there is no problem with me arguing with them as they get further and further drunk... because aparently i know nothing about computers. and these people know what the "experts" say.
i.e. the people on the tv that they worship... gah!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 02:59 pm (UTC)it's fucken insane arguing with people this stupid. people who don't understand how it works. even the 2038/9 "bug."
it's just ... damn!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 06:17 pm (UTC)personally my prep for y2k was to just buy more ammo
..from the reviews..
Date: 2006-01-02 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 04:03 pm (UTC)I had this conversation at least 100 times in '99 with various friends and family....
Luser: so what's going to happen at the end of the year?
Leo: Absolutely nothing!
Luser: but *so and so* on TV says *blah blah blah*
and, depending on my irritation level, my responses varied from "oh, yea, I think I saw that in the National Enquirer too" too "you believe everything you see and hear on TV fucktard?" and the converstaion was ended there.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 05:15 pm (UTC)(snicker)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 09:38 pm (UTC)I hope this one helps alleviate the headache
no subject
Date: 2006-01-01 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-02 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-02 04:24 am (UTC)discussion (http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2005-12/msg00582.html)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-02 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-02 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 09:28 pm (UTC)Source (http://www.energy.ca.gov/daylightsaving.html).
no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 11:45 pm (UTC)And yes, some people will always get up early enough to need lights anyway. But the bulk of the population will still be getting up after dawn even with daylight saving. In terms of electricity saved, it makes more sense overall to have the daylight moved to the evening, when usage is heavier.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-02 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-03 09:04 pm (UTC)Can i interest you in a DVD Rewinder?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 02:02 am (UTC)We do a GPS software for cell phones, and the internal receivers of certain types of phones took a week number in hexadecimal to figure the date. But when week 256 rolled around, the phone hardware itself got stuck in a "I want to reset the phone's internal clock" loop between the receiver and the cellular network.
And then we had a metric fuckton of people pissed off at our service even though it wasn't us, but the phone manufacturer that fucked it up.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 08:08 am (UTC)Now, take a few minutes to digest that idiocy.
Yes, she did. Today's date on our computers? July 11, 1967.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 07:48 pm (UTC)=P