(no subject)
Sep. 8th, 2005 01:09 pmSo recently a guy was talking to me about an updating issue, and we were disconnected.
It's my center's policy for frontline agents not to make outbound calls, instead, we pass it on for a manager to check up on.
I got disconnected from a guy that emailed back and said basically "excuse me, we were disconnected and you haven't called back yet, can you?"
I gave him my response that unfortunately, I can't call back, but I can set him up for a callback tomorrow if he wants that. He responds and says "that's what they did and you hung up on me".
Seeing as I was busy with another call, I ignored this for the moment.
When I finished the call, I went to lunch. When I came back from lunch, I had 58 new email messages from this guy.
He literally spammed me, because that's very obviously the way to get a technician's attention.
My only question to my manager was, should I reply to every one of his 58 email messages with a standard letter? After all, it'd be rude to not respond at all...
It's my center's policy for frontline agents not to make outbound calls, instead, we pass it on for a manager to check up on.
I got disconnected from a guy that emailed back and said basically "excuse me, we were disconnected and you haven't called back yet, can you?"
I gave him my response that unfortunately, I can't call back, but I can set him up for a callback tomorrow if he wants that. He responds and says "that's what they did and you hung up on me".
Seeing as I was busy with another call, I ignored this for the moment.
When I finished the call, I went to lunch. When I came back from lunch, I had 58 new email messages from this guy.
He literally spammed me, because that's very obviously the way to get a technician's attention.
My only question to my manager was, should I reply to every one of his 58 email messages with a standard letter? After all, it'd be rude to not respond at all...
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 04:21 pm (UTC)On the plus side, I can reply to all 30 with a "no" with a few keystrokes a button push. Ain't tech great :)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 05:21 pm (UTC)And definately,
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 06:38 pm (UTC)No, on second thought, just send them the TOS. In a really tiny font.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-09 01:27 am (UTC)