Looking for input
Sep. 7th, 2005 01:31 amI'm looking for two things for my current company.
Right now we are pretty much fly by night for support. No trouble ticketing system or monitoring of our mission critical servers to speak of.
I've used Cacti and Nagios for monitoring in the past and both have their positive sides and negatives as well.
Cacti is fast easy to configure and I like it's layout but linking to it is somewhat of a pain in the butt when it comes to calling information from the "outside world." Nagios on the other hand is a real pain to set up, uses perl, but when it is up and running it's great. It's easily scalable and all that crap.
And now for the ticketing system.
I've used so many different ticket systems and CRM solutions I can no longer name them all. Some of the best I've seen were pretty much home brew hacked together solutions. Does anyone have a preferred product out there. Oh and about those linux zealots, yeah I work with em and it's gotta run on a linux server and be mostly unencumbered as far as licensing. I could slam something together with tkreq but that's just not pretty nor is it really adequate for what we'll need in the near future.
I don't wanna hemorage customers, as much as I hate em, they are my paycheck.
Right now we are pretty much fly by night for support. No trouble ticketing system or monitoring of our mission critical servers to speak of.
I've used Cacti and Nagios for monitoring in the past and both have their positive sides and negatives as well.
Cacti is fast easy to configure and I like it's layout but linking to it is somewhat of a pain in the butt when it comes to calling information from the "outside world." Nagios on the other hand is a real pain to set up, uses perl, but when it is up and running it's great. It's easily scalable and all that crap.
And now for the ticketing system.
I've used so many different ticket systems and CRM solutions I can no longer name them all. Some of the best I've seen were pretty much home brew hacked together solutions. Does anyone have a preferred product out there. Oh and about those linux zealots, yeah I work with em and it's gotta run on a linux server and be mostly unencumbered as far as licensing. I could slam something together with tkreq but that's just not pretty nor is it really adequate for what we'll need in the near future.
I don't wanna hemorage customers, as much as I hate em, they are my paycheck.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 09:23 am (UTC)For alerts, as much of a pain in the arse it is to set up, I'd go with Nagios. It's pretty easy for anyone to tell when shit's broken.
And I freely admit it, I love the 1930's AWOOGA car horn sound it makes when hosts go down :D
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 10:18 am (UTC)I vote for Big Brother (http://www.bb4.org/features.html) as well. It is a pretty well-known monitoring tool which has the usual sort of features out of the box (including paging support) and a pile of plugins have been already developed. Free for non-commercial use.
Cricket (http://sourceforge.net/projects/cricket) is purely on the GPL, but I think would take a bit of tweaking, although lots of plugins have been made for that too (I've only used it as an end-user).
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 03:42 pm (UTC)jira and confluence (http://www.atlassian.com) (commercial)
these are from people at the sage-au conference this week, who use them and don't hate them.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 04:16 pm (UTC)As far as comercial:
I've used Remedy, and a few propriotary in house things. they were ok.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-07 05:23 pm (UTC)