[identity profile] guitarguy1980.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] techrecovery
I just got off the phone with one of my tire retreading plants out in bumfuck wherever. When he called up with his problem with his handhelds, and I asked what version of windows he was running, I expected to hear 2000 or XP...

He comes back with: Windows 3.1.

3.1.

I haven't seen a copy of 3.1 functioning in over a decade. Wow. Much less, running a business on it.

I thought it was bad when I came across a copy of 98SE out there running a retread shop, but this takes the cake.

I thought you all would enjoy that.

Date: 2005-08-01 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zig-mover.livejournal.com
on a handheld? i didn't know they had handhelds back then.

Date: 2005-08-01 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katyism.livejournal.com
perhaps he's using 3.1 on the pc that he wants to sync his handhelds with.

Date: 2005-08-01 08:46 pm (UTC)

Date: 2005-08-01 08:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] photosinensis.livejournal.com
Wow. How does he do any networking with that?

Date: 2005-08-01 09:10 pm (UTC)
jecook: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jecook
ow.ow.ow.ow.ow.ow.

One of the things I was involved in when I was working for [credit union] back in 97-99 was the windows 95 conversion corporate wide. I still remember having to deal with some of the 3.1 machines in our records department that had some really funky image software on them... ::shudder::

Date: 2005-08-01 09:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abstrak-tokatl.livejournal.com
hey! 98SE is a lot better then the faux linux millenium crap that has come out lately.

Date: 2005-08-01 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drquuxum.livejournal.com
Win 3.1 still runs on one of our data acquisition machines. No, it is not on a network. The floppy is its only contact with the outside world.

Off topic but...

Date: 2005-08-02 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crankyholly.livejournal.com
Two hundred and forty dollars worth of pudding...

Awwwww - yeah.

Was off topic, now just group whoring ;-)

Date: 2005-08-02 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drquuxum.livejournal.com
You ought to see [livejournal.com profile] the_state.

[back on-topic]

I forgot some of our old DOS 6.22 386s at the Observatory. :-D

Date: 2005-08-01 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unixwiz.livejournal.com
Up until a few years ago, I actually still had a working copy of Windows 286. For those of you that do not know what this was, here is a link:

http://internet.ls-la.net/ms-evolution/windows-286/

Date: 2005-08-01 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-s-guy.livejournal.com
My folks got one of those with their Amstrad clone, way back when. I installed it, tried using it for a bit, then went back to DOS 3.3.

Date: 2005-08-02 05:24 am (UTC)
ext_8716: (Default)
From: [identity profile] trixtah.livejournal.com
How embarrassing to admit that *I* had a PC with that loaded. Back in the day, indeed.

Date: 2005-08-01 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trenthamfamily.livejournal.com
Daaaaaaaaaaaaang LOL

Date: 2005-08-01 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] axessdenyd.livejournal.com
SE isn't old at all!

Well.

We'd see it all the time at my shop, anyway.

Date: 2005-08-01 11:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madd-trinity.livejournal.com
3.1. LOL

That's pretty sad.

Date: 2005-08-02 12:24 am (UTC)
jjjiii: It's pug! (Default)
From: [personal profile] jjjiii
Still uing 95 at work on a few workstations.

Date: 2005-08-02 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubhain.livejournal.com
Unfortunately, the law enforcement agency I worked at until recently is still a primarily Win9x shop. Much W95 there, Mostly W98. And they still have a few laptops running Win3.1.

It was...f'ugly. And I haven't even mentioned the NT4 production servers....

Date: 2005-08-02 01:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 110billion.livejournal.com
My first 'pc' was a Win 3.1 machine. It worked... slowly.

Date: 2005-08-02 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdrproteus.livejournal.com
Technically that was my first PC....of course most of the time I used DOS 6.2 to play games :P

Date: 2005-08-02 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdrproteus.livejournal.com
I want to say that's old, but I'm sure someone will say that someone somewhere is running Windows 2.0 for god knows what reason.

And to think I bitched that some of our workstations ran Windows 95 (they don't now, thankfully, although trying to cram XP in a P3-450 with 128mb can be painful x_x )

Date: 2005-08-02 02:32 am (UTC)
brotherflounder: (Default)
From: [personal profile] brotherflounder
Or even worse, Windows ME. *shudder*

Date: 2005-08-02 04:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thecrazyfinn.livejournal.com
Dude, there's Xenix machines still croaking. And I'm talking MS Xenix, not SCO.

Date: 2005-08-02 02:34 am (UTC)
brotherflounder: (Default)
From: [personal profile] brotherflounder
I don't suppose there's a chance he got confused and meant 2000 w/ SP3?

Probably not.

Date: 2005-08-02 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] codedigital.livejournal.com
3.1 is still pretty prevelant, more so 3.11

Win98SE is still VERY widely used. I see it all the time.

Date: 2005-08-02 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sketchydave.livejournal.com
I actually have an old notebook at work that I set up as a dual-boot Win95 / Win 2000 machine.

It exists soley for the purpose of testing out web pages. If its at all legible on a Win95 machine I know its acceptible for everything else. I work at a hospital so often times they want everything accessible to everyone no matter what.

Date: 2005-08-02 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-broli.livejournal.com
LOL at least he didn't need to install the .NET Framework on it...

Date: 2005-08-02 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] c0c0c0.livejournal.com
I have a laptop that still works that has 3.11 for workgroups on it. I also have Dos and Windows 3.11 on floppy in the original pristine packaging.

Profile

techrecovery: (Default)
Elitist Computer Nerd Posse

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 20th, 2026 03:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios