I just got off the phone with one of my tire retreading plants out in bumfuck wherever. When he called up with his problem with his handhelds, and I asked what version of windows he was running, I expected to hear 2000 or XP...
He comes back with: Windows 3.1.
3.1.
I haven't seen a copy of 3.1 functioning in over a decade. Wow. Much less, running a business on it.
I thought it was bad when I came across a copy of 98SE out there running a retread shop, but this takes the cake.
I thought you all would enjoy that.
He comes back with: Windows 3.1.
3.1.
I haven't seen a copy of 3.1 functioning in over a decade. Wow. Much less, running a business on it.
I thought it was bad when I came across a copy of 98SE out there running a retread shop, but this takes the cake.
I thought you all would enjoy that.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 09:10 pm (UTC)One of the things I was involved in when I was working for [credit union] back in 97-99 was the windows 95 conversion corporate wide. I still remember having to deal with some of the 3.1 machines in our records department that had some really funky image software on them... ::shudder::
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 09:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 09:17 pm (UTC)Off topic but...
Date: 2005-08-02 02:53 am (UTC)Awwwww - yeah.
Was off topic, now just group whoring ;-)
Date: 2005-08-02 11:14 am (UTC)[back on-topic]
I forgot some of our old DOS 6.22 386s at the Observatory. :-D
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 09:20 pm (UTC)http://internet.ls-la.net/ms-evolution/windows-286/
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 11:20 pm (UTC)Well.
We'd see it all the time at my shop, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-01 11:25 pm (UTC)That's pretty sad.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 12:42 am (UTC)It was...f'ugly. And I haven't even mentioned the NT4 production servers....
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:19 am (UTC)And to think I bitched that some of our workstations ran Windows 95 (they don't now, thankfully, although trying to cram XP in a P3-450 with 128mb can be painful x_x )
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 02:34 am (UTC)Probably not.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:07 pm (UTC)Win98SE is still VERY widely used. I see it all the time.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:28 pm (UTC)It exists soley for the purpose of testing out web pages. If its at all legible on a Win95 machine I know its acceptible for everything else. I work at a hospital so often times they want everything accessible to everyone no matter what.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-02 03:06 pm (UTC)