Wow, sir, that's a new one
Jul. 18th, 2005 04:38 pm"I got 250 memories of gigabyte..."
Fortunately, I'm not waiting on this guy.
[edit: the guy stood there and massacred the entire spec list of his computer. 1.something Pentium Intel 4. 52X (yes, he said "X") CD-RAM. Yes, CD-RAM. We're still not sure how much RAM or hard drive space he had, because he kept changing the numbers and the megabytes and the gigabytes and whatever the hell else he was throwing in there because it sounded SMRT. Then he proceeded to slaughter the entire spec list of the computer he wants. 3.something Pentium Intel 4, (number)X(number)X(number) DVD burner (he had some amazing term for this too, but I can't recall what it was on account of me alternately beating my head on my desk and trying not to laugh too loud at the time) 256 gigabyte monitor card, and a bunch of other shit we couldn't really figure out. And then the kicker: "...well, I don't know nothin' about a computer." YOU DON'T SAY.]
Fortunately, I'm not waiting on this guy.
[edit: the guy stood there and massacred the entire spec list of his computer. 1.something Pentium Intel 4. 52X (yes, he said "X") CD-RAM. Yes, CD-RAM. We're still not sure how much RAM or hard drive space he had, because he kept changing the numbers and the megabytes and the gigabytes and whatever the hell else he was throwing in there because it sounded SMRT. Then he proceeded to slaughter the entire spec list of the computer he wants. 3.something Pentium Intel 4, (number)X(number)X(number) DVD burner (he had some amazing term for this too, but I can't recall what it was on account of me alternately beating my head on my desk and trying not to laugh too loud at the time) 256 gigabyte monitor card, and a bunch of other shit we couldn't really figure out. And then the kicker: "...well, I don't know nothin' about a computer." YOU DON'T SAY.]
no subject
Date: 2005-07-18 11:05 pm (UTC)::snicker::
I wish I had *4* GB of memory. it's help my quake deathmatches run smoother...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 12:40 am (UTC)?
Date: 2005-07-19 10:33 am (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2005-07-19 04:21 pm (UTC)Clarification... and why I know what I'm talking about
Date: 2005-07-19 04:34 pm (UTC)To be clear, I work on mainframes for a living.
zSeries: z990 (http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/z990/glance.html)
This tops out at 256GB of RAM.
iSeries: cluster i5 595 (http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/hardware/595/specifications.html)
This tops out at 2TB of RAM.
pSeries: p5 595 (http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/pseries/hardware/highend/595_specs.html)
This also tops out at 2TB of RAM.
xSeries: Intel-based (http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/xseries/x460.html)
Tops out at 64GB of RAM.
Also, remember that calculating Pi fast has almost nothing to do with memory and everything to do with number crunching speed (CPU speed).
Re: Clarification... and why I know what I'm talking about
Date: 2005-07-20 12:07 am (UTC)> you think that ram has almost nothing to do with memory. amusing. in
> fact, it is precisely the size of registers associated with 64bit
> processing and the large memory buffers that allow the processor,
> regardless of speed to do its work.
registers are in a CPU, not memory. Granted, using a 64-bit processor can speed up certain calculation, but more RAM != more speed.
I'm not involved in tech support anymore. Instead, I am actually a programmer in cryptography, so I'm very familiar with using assembler language to perform crypto operations, and with optimizations for using a 64-bit processor instead of a 32-bit one.
Re: ?
Date: 2005-07-19 09:07 pm (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2005-07-19 11:54 pm (UTC)Re: ?
Date: 2005-07-19 04:47 pm (UTC)But considering this is a Joe Luser's Home PC, the chances of that are "exceedingly slim" to "precisely fuckall."
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-21 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 05:17 am (UTC)WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW??
no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-19 08:26 am (UTC)http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/uglydog.asp