Logical disconnect
Jun. 18th, 2005 04:23 amDon't know if you guys have been hit by this fucker : http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.mytob.es@mm.html
Basically it makes the emails look like they're coming from the ISP.
cut for angry sweary ranting
This customer has emailed us three times to ask about the emails. She opens the attachments every single goddamned time, then emails us to ask why a) her account has been closed, b) her password has been changed and c) her (ISP) "user profile" has been changed - because these are the things the emails claims to be occurring.
She also requests a callback every single time. We don't do callbacks on grave plus any issue that can be resolved via email will be - we're not going to waste our time calling someone when they have already read the answer. Here is her latest email. Note the complete lack of connection between separate thoughts in her brain as evidenced by the first two sentences.
I have emailed you about this already and you said that (ISP) never sends
attachments. I am scared this is a farce and if I open the attachment it
will be a virus. Please CALL me I've asked you to do this several times on (number)
DUBBLE YYOO TEE EFF WTF WTF WTF This blows my fucking mind.
"You have said A. I am worried that A. Is A?"
"FUCKING A!!!!"
My response :
As you have been previously advised on multiple occasions, these emails ARE a hoax, the attachments ARE a virus and (ISP) will NEVER send you an attachment. This is not only true for the emails you have already received, but any FURTHER emails you receive. Do not open the attachment and delete the emails immediately.
We operate an inbound contact centre. If you wish to speak to us directly you must call us on (number), yet no further action need be taken by you or us in this instance - simply delete the emails. If you wish you may read about the virus on this page : http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.mytob.es@mm.html
Shut the fuck up,
Incredulite
Basically it makes the emails look like they're coming from the ISP.
cut for angry sweary ranting
This customer has emailed us three times to ask about the emails. She opens the attachments every single goddamned time, then emails us to ask why a) her account has been closed, b) her password has been changed and c) her (ISP) "user profile" has been changed - because these are the things the emails claims to be occurring.
She also requests a callback every single time. We don't do callbacks on grave plus any issue that can be resolved via email will be - we're not going to waste our time calling someone when they have already read the answer. Here is her latest email. Note the complete lack of connection between separate thoughts in her brain as evidenced by the first two sentences.
I have emailed you about this already and you said that (ISP) never sends
attachments. I am scared this is a farce and if I open the attachment it
will be a virus. Please CALL me I've asked you to do this several times on (number)
DUBBLE YYOO TEE EFF WTF WTF WTF This blows my fucking mind.
"You have said A. I am worried that A. Is A?"
"FUCKING A!!!!"
My response :
As you have been previously advised on multiple occasions, these emails ARE a hoax, the attachments ARE a virus and (ISP) will NEVER send you an attachment. This is not only true for the emails you have already received, but any FURTHER emails you receive. Do not open the attachment and delete the emails immediately.
We operate an inbound contact centre. If you wish to speak to us directly you must call us on (number), yet no further action need be taken by you or us in this instance - simply delete the emails. If you wish you may read about the virus on this page : http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.mytob.es@mm.html
Shut the fuck up,
Incredulite
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:50 pm (UTC)Too bad that's a very tiny minority.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:05 pm (UTC)Although, I knew we were going to run into problems the moment someone figured out how to make these and use spell check. Amazing.
I've always wanted to say, "Ma'am, this was actually a test to rate the intelligence of our customer base, and their ability to comprehend basic security and computer best practices. Unfortunately, you failed miserably. Please make sure to completely clean out your desk and turn in your ID badge before the end of the business day. Have a wonderful weekend...buh bye."
You know, we'd save a lot of sanity points if they actually bothered to pre-screen applicants before hiring them, especially seeing as they're not concerned about training them afterwards. Not all of them are stupid, but my head aches from the utterly asinine calls I've taken today.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:24 pm (UTC)The difference between 17,000 and 250,000 (the number of customers only one of our sub-ISPs has) is an order of magnitude. I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying that the cost of such a high-end, interactive, update-pushing antivirus system quickly becomes prohibitive as the number of users rises. Considering that ISPs in my country can find it hard to profit off basic email services, it is in no way cost-effective to implement such systems.
It sucks, but hey, so does herpes. You just gotta deal with it. Maybe one day they'll find a cure ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 08:32 pm (UTC)oh, so you're the one!
Date: 2005-06-17 08:53 pm (UTC);-)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-17 11:18 pm (UTC)Us (a long long time ago): Sorry, we do not offer any message filtering services. Any anti-virus/spam filtering and management is soley the responsibility of the account owner.
Luser: That is bullshit, there is no reason why you can't filter our messages for viruses and spam! (ISP) does.
Us (present day): The message was bounced? In order to prevent this from happening you will need to either add the recipient to your whitelist or lower your filtering setting.
Luser: That is bullshit! You have no right to filter our messages like this. My business relys on e-mail and your company is costing me thousands of dollars. I have my own software that I use and you have no right to deny me my e-mail messages!
Either way, we're fucked. Plus although these messages may appear to be coming from a domain that we host, there is still no guarantee that we are the MTA. So long as e-mail clients still allow users to specifiy who the message is originating from, spoofing will still need to be taken into account. Unfortunately there are still many, many mail servers out there that act as an open relay.
The solution needs to be that people who don't know what the fuck they're doing on a computer should not be permitted within 100 yards of said machinary. I know I can't operate a bulldozer, I'm not about to go play GTA on the construction grounds. *headdesk*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-19 12:52 pm (UTC)I guess there's not really a major market for a useful user-oriented front end for this stuff. Something that would accept an ISP default set of filters, have some of the settings only editable by the ISP, and make others tweakable by end-users using a couple of toggles (basic interface), a page of sliders (advanced interface) or direct filter regexes (administrative interface).
Note that I never said giving people (at least partial) control over something would stop them whining about it...
no subject
Date: 2005-06-20 03:17 pm (UTC)