Customer of the Year
May. 26th, 2004 09:22 pmSo I got this call from *unnamed ISP* indicating that a customer was getting only 2 megs on a 6 meg ADSL line. Still decent speeds, but still, something seemed off.
I telnetted into the backhaul switches. The utilization of the switches were fluctuating between 300% and 700% (NO that is not a typo). I asked the ISP if the customer was runnnig a server. He said that he had 6 PCs but at this time he has only one directly linked to his CPE. So I rebuild his backhaul. I got him moved to another backhaul... No change in bandwidth. He's running Windows XP on his machine. Apparantly, he hooked each computer up individually and there was no change in the bandwidth.
I asked the ISP to have the customer switch PCs. The customer switches it from the XP machine to the LINUX machine. Bandwidth drops immediately to 30% utilization over the backhaul. Speed tests cap out at about 5 - 5.5 megs. We check his XP machine for Viri, but there was nothing. So I mention spyware.
End user has never heard of Spyware. He had never run a spyware check. He didn't know that he was supposed to click "no" on those little popup windows... I pity the poor ISP having to walk this guy through downloading and removing spyware.
Dear lord. Issue solved! But only solved after wasting an hour and 20 minutes where I could have been working genuine issues.
I telnetted into the backhaul switches. The utilization of the switches were fluctuating between 300% and 700% (NO that is not a typo). I asked the ISP if the customer was runnnig a server. He said that he had 6 PCs but at this time he has only one directly linked to his CPE. So I rebuild his backhaul. I got him moved to another backhaul... No change in bandwidth. He's running Windows XP on his machine. Apparantly, he hooked each computer up individually and there was no change in the bandwidth.
I asked the ISP to have the customer switch PCs. The customer switches it from the XP machine to the LINUX machine. Bandwidth drops immediately to 30% utilization over the backhaul. Speed tests cap out at about 5 - 5.5 megs. We check his XP machine for Viri, but there was nothing. So I mention spyware.
End user has never heard of Spyware. He had never run a spyware check. He didn't know that he was supposed to click "no" on those little popup windows... I pity the poor ISP having to walk this guy through downloading and removing spyware.
Dear lord. Issue solved! But only solved after wasting an hour and 20 minutes where I could have been working genuine issues.
On the subject..
Date: 2004-05-26 08:43 pm (UTC)I'm glad all we're required to do is say words to the effect of "(insert company name here) has an anti-spyware program that our sales dept can sell you, and you can also find free programs on the internet."
I'm going above and beyond by saying this much:
"While (insert company name here) does not support the usage of these programs, there are some good freeware programs out there called Ad-Aware and SpyBot, that have received favorable reviews in big-name magazines such as PC Magazine and others, and are available by typing "adaware" and "spybot" into a search engine such as google.com."
I laugh at the people who paid money for Norton's anti spyware program. I have no faith in Norton anymore =/
Hey wait a minute the guy's actually well versed enough to run 'nix, but doesn't know what spyware is? ugh...that explains a network of XP machines. XP = short bus windows.
I should really make more actual posts and less essay-length comments..
Re: On the subject..
Date: 2004-05-26 08:58 pm (UTC)My respect for these people have dropped considerably.
Re: On the subject..
Date: 2004-05-27 05:14 am (UTC)I hear it's extremely streamlined and idiot-proof.
D'oh. :|
Re: On the subject..
Date: 2004-05-27 09:53 am (UTC)Re: On the subject..
Date: 2004-05-27 11:25 am (UTC)in the defense of the average linux user
Date: 2004-05-27 09:52 am (UTC)also its like a mac user or a windows user or a *nix user. if they never use the other fro whatever reason then they never learn how to troubleshoot it. and aside from mac osx being unix based now its gerally a differnent beastie entirely. windows is very different than linux.
so linux users are not gods. they are just useing something different.
Re: in the defense of the average linux user
Date: 2004-05-27 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-26 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 05:29 am (UTC)But still, how can you not /know/? He didn't wonder about all the random little popups he was receiving all over his desktop? Argh.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-27 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 09:02 am (UTC)and how hard I'm trying not to go
"cake or death"
"death...I meant cake"
"No...you said death...oh alright, good thing we're church of england..."
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 12:10 pm (UTC)I heart Eddie.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 12:19 pm (UTC)I was with my mother and started randomly doing babies on spikes...
she was confused