Page Summary
jjjiii - (no subject)
bamatone.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lunatic59.livejournal.com - (no subject)
daddykatt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stereotypedlife.livejournal.com - (no subject)
faceless-wonder.livejournal.com - (no subject)
preserver3.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mcity.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 05:27 am (UTC)* my cow-orkers aren't going to call me up 5 minutes before a scheduled visit saying their car broke down. They keep their vehicles maintained enough to be able to do their jobs. (Not sure how rare it is, but we're definitely paid more than enough to do that maintenance, with mileage reimbursement on top of that)
* my cow-orkers aren't going to show up to a client's place of business in a ratty t-shirt and jeans and say "yo dude" to the company president. They dress and act appropriate for the work environment. Clients appreciate the professionalism, and unlike stereotypical "consultants", they don't get nasty surprises 6 months later when it turns out everything was just smoke and mirrors.
Of course, the people I work with aren't the types that need to be told these things, but putting the requirements in means less resumes from people who need to be working somewhere else. I'm not trying to say that showing up to work in pajamas is a bad thing - it works in a lot of places - just that I *like* working in a place with those "professionalism" sort of requirements, and I kinda resent the implication that it's automatically a crap job.
TL;DR: I'm a weirdo who actually enjoys working within those sorts of requirements.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 05:28 am (UTC)The posted job is clearly total crap. :) Not all "professional" jobs are though.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 01:15 pm (UTC)(Maybe they meant Virtual.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-30 07:29 pm (UTC)Many people lolled on the outside at that one.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-01 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-02 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-03 01:05 pm (UTC)Because solutions like SELinux are so wonderful to use to (among other things) fix the 1978 permissioning model on *nix boxes.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-01 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 06:40 am (UTC)