I really do like taking tech support calls from army bases. In contrast to the majority of my other calls, the people who call me from there understand my instructions the first time I issue them, confirm all instructions when I make them, and follow said instructions. They're almost invariably good-natured as well -- it's pretty amazing if you ask me. It's so very pleasant.
Plus, hearing, "Yes, ma'am," from a young man is a good way to hit my buttons. :D
Plus, hearing, "Yes, ma'am," from a young man is a good way to hit my buttons. :D
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:29 pm (UTC)Also, I hate it when they call me "Ma'am"
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:12 am (UTC)*grins* I may have to try that on mine.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:40 pm (UTC)Amusingly, it's the wing wipers that are the cageiest. Our Army customers are damn chill and responsive, most of the time.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 11:08 pm (UTC)I only dealt with the marines once, and once the ESL sgt understood what I was asking, he handed me off to the right person.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 05:02 am (UTC)When I was working in (civilian) government departments, we'd occasionally get ex-military staff who had transferred out. The first one I ever ran into became my boss's manager shortly after, and he was brilliant. Calm, collected, nothing ever fazed him until the day one of our customers leapt the counter and punched him out.
Unfortunately, the few others I've run into since then have been a lot more stereotypical in that they were martinets with no capacity for original thought or ability to adapt to fluid situations. While this approach does have its advantages (baseline auditing, making sure everything on a checklist is checked), it's usually not terribly helpful in the world of tech support.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:35 pm (UTC)*shrugs* darned if you do, darned if you don't?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-24 10:33 pm (UTC)We are/were just like regular people, only with shittier hours.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 07:25 am (UTC)One day, I was feeling goofy, and I used comic book characters. Worked way better than NATO phonetic.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 09:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 09:04 pm (UTC)It annoys me how often civvies can't grasp the concept of ANY phonetic set. Honestly, it's not like when I was a small kid and I first heard "Able, Baker, Charlie" somebody had to explain to me what that meant. It's fucking OBVIOUS.
(It also mildly boggles me how much hate people have for military time. It just makes so much more SENSE...)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 09:05 pm (UTC)Try APCO
Date: 2008-11-26 12:38 am (UTC)I've found that the NATO set is similarly confusing to some of them, especially the dispatchers, err... telecommunicators.
Re: Try APCO
Date: 2008-11-26 12:07 pm (UTC)Re: Try APCO
Date: 2008-12-02 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-26 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-25 07:57 am (UTC)