I propose a new network protocol
Aug. 26th, 2008 10:22 pmBOIP - booze over IP.
Who is with me?
ETA
You are all shameless geeks.
Thankfully ;) Take one shiny internet... running BOIP and all the other protocols here, especially SPITFOIP because it's awesome :-D
Who is with me?
ETA
You are all shameless geeks.
Thankfully ;) Take one shiny internet... running BOIP and all the other protocols here, especially SPITFOIP because it's awesome :-D
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:01 am (UTC)Although I do want to make sure that we can pass rum through without latency or packet loss- that would suck.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 09:34 am (UTC)I think we can safely say that a minimum amount of processing occurs when passing a frame of Beer, and the hour or so of latency between import and export shouldn't be a problem at the physical connection as long as volume remains consistent.
No more will we conduct business in mere pitchers of beer. A packet of beer should be composed of multiple frames of beer. Those who fail to purchase their round of packets, should suffer some strict packet filtering or after repeated mooching off the main switch, a temporary ban until they come up with the proper protocols.
And remember, drink responsibly and if you need to drive, insure a Designated Relay without a physical connection to the BOIP network, to avoid unnecessary and costly crashes and system audits.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:18 am (UTC)(the above brought to you be a genuine face-on-keyboard moment)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 10:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:01 am (UTC)I pray for this nightly - and I'm agnostic!
Date: 2008-08-27 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 06:02 am (UTC)BOIP
Date: 2008-08-27 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 07:39 am (UTC)I mean, if IP over Carrier Pigeon can get it's own RFC....
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 08:16 am (UTC)it's time to generate an RFC, otherwise it's not official.
and a way to manage packet loss.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 10:27 am (UTC)My shop keeps trying to order beer and naps from newegg.com and failing miserably.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 12:40 pm (UTC)That would make my day (life).
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 06:22 pm (UTC)