No, your PC really is offline.
May. 2nd, 2008 11:09 pmPhone rings, I answer. Big mistake.
User requests to speak to Coworker (male), or someone who knows about computers. I explain Coworker is absent today, and that I can help. User declines my help, asks to speak to another (also male) colleague instead. OtherColleague is also magically unavailable. User requests someone who knows about computers. I repeat that I can indeed help, despite possessing breasts instead of testicles.
User says his PC is telling him his roaming profile cannot be found, and Windows is logging him on with a temporary profile.
I ping the PC, and do a few other things to confirm that yes, this PC is offline. Reboot, check cables are correctly seated, according to the user, blahblahblah test stuff, and I send out a ticket for OnsiteTech to investigate, having concluded to my own satisfaction that nothing was bringing this PC onto the network from my (250km away) vantage point.
User clearly does not believe that his PC has no network, despite the fact shared drives, email, network profile, &c are all unavailable. It takes a five minute argument to get him to CHECK the damn cables. User apparently believes that the PC would not boot if the network was not present. (User appears to have head buried in backside.)
Half an hour passes.
User calls again, and gets my colleague on the line. My (very new) colleague patiently explains that no, $Program will not work without a network connection. Colleague investigates ticket database, explains that I have already logged a ticket with OnsiteTech to check hardware. User hangs up on Colleague mid-sentence.
Half an hour passes.
BigBoss calls (about three levels up the hierarchy from User). BigBoss has been speaking directly with $ProgramSupportTeam, who explain patiently but less politely that $Program does not work without a network connection, and that perhaps onsite support should investigate this. BigBoss is most grumpy, and demands to know why tech support did not diagnose the lack of network connectivity in the first phonecall, an hour previous.
I am currently the second-longest-serving technician in my helpdesk. I explain, with references to the previous ticket logged, that User is thick, and refused to believe that I could diagnose a network fault via the ping, lack of profile, email, etc, as aforementioned. I also point out that NewbieColleague explained this too. I refrain from suggesting that User is a sexist twat; however, BigBoss is not stupid, and can read between the lines.
BigBoss promises to rip User a new asshole, and goes to ring OnsiteTech to ask for an ETA.
We like BigBoss.
User requests to speak to Coworker (male), or someone who knows about computers. I explain Coworker is absent today, and that I can help. User declines my help, asks to speak to another (also male) colleague instead. OtherColleague is also magically unavailable. User requests someone who knows about computers. I repeat that I can indeed help, despite possessing breasts instead of testicles.
User says his PC is telling him his roaming profile cannot be found, and Windows is logging him on with a temporary profile.
I ping the PC, and do a few other things to confirm that yes, this PC is offline. Reboot, check cables are correctly seated, according to the user, blahblahblah test stuff, and I send out a ticket for OnsiteTech to investigate, having concluded to my own satisfaction that nothing was bringing this PC onto the network from my (250km away) vantage point.
User clearly does not believe that his PC has no network, despite the fact shared drives, email, network profile, &c are all unavailable. It takes a five minute argument to get him to CHECK the damn cables. User apparently believes that the PC would not boot if the network was not present. (User appears to have head buried in backside.)
Half an hour passes.
User calls again, and gets my colleague on the line. My (very new) colleague patiently explains that no, $Program will not work without a network connection. Colleague investigates ticket database, explains that I have already logged a ticket with OnsiteTech to check hardware. User hangs up on Colleague mid-sentence.
Half an hour passes.
BigBoss calls (about three levels up the hierarchy from User). BigBoss has been speaking directly with $ProgramSupportTeam, who explain patiently but less politely that $Program does not work without a network connection, and that perhaps onsite support should investigate this. BigBoss is most grumpy, and demands to know why tech support did not diagnose the lack of network connectivity in the first phonecall, an hour previous.
I am currently the second-longest-serving technician in my helpdesk. I explain, with references to the previous ticket logged, that User is thick, and refused to believe that I could diagnose a network fault via the ping, lack of profile, email, etc, as aforementioned. I also point out that NewbieColleague explained this too. I refrain from suggesting that User is a sexist twat; however, BigBoss is not stupid, and can read between the lines.
BigBoss promises to rip User a new asshole, and goes to ring OnsiteTech to ask for an ETA.
We like BigBoss.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 11:39 am (UTC)I've yet to run into any asshattery of those proportions, but once in a while it does get a little annoying when someone decides to begin their explanation of how it can't POSSIBLY be their computer that's at fault, it MUST be our network, with "Listen, sweetheart...".
I like BigBoss too ^^.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 12:19 pm (UTC)Yay BigBoss.
Maybe a nice rocket up the arse would help Asshattery Syndrome.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:14 pm (UTC)Maybe a nice rocket up the arse would help Asshattery Syndrome.
I thought that was the preferred prescription? ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:28 pm (UTC)I think the adult store I was in last night sells those.
*runs far away*
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:16 pm (UTC)I don't mind "Listen, love," because I'm in the northwest of England and pretty much everyone is 'love' or 'babe', male or female, young or old, so it doesn't bother me. But the pet names do.
It's the fact it's not just patronising, it's so entitled - so "I'm paying for your help so I can call you whatever I like dearie".
Yuck! :)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 12:07 pm (UTC)Good on your boss for listening to the full backstory and supporting it. I've seen other bosses with much less clue.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 11:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:10 pm (UTC)Glad to hear that your boss was able to take in the facts and support you in how you did things. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 09:19 pm (UTC)Thank you! Exactly. I mean...if YOU already know all the answers, wtf are you calling ME for?! I used to get that all the time.
User: "this is what it is doing or not doing"
Me: "this is what I think the problem is"
User: "oh I don't think it's that"
Me: "oh really. And in your oh so expert opinion, please do tell...what DO you think it is? And what steps will you take to resolve it?"
Gah.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:29 pm (UTC)That's usually someone one picks up within pico-seconds during a face to face meeting...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-02 09:24 pm (UTC)Jeers to sexist dickwad.