Relay Calls
Aug. 28th, 2006 04:08 pmWho has had the distinct pleasure in dealing with Relay Calls? Oh, man. I don't have the problem with the person using the service. They are handicapped and I completely understand . But you have not lived until you have been on a relay call with an operator who is incredibly unfamiliar with tech terms and acronyms. So not only did he ask me to repeat and spell everything, but he had the poor guy at the other end doing the same. It did amuse me a little when the operator said "bah sod" for "BSOD", though.
Gewd gawd. That was the longest call in my life.
Gewd gawd. That was the longest call in my life.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 08:28 pm (UTC)Usually what I do at the beginning of those calls is offer my email address to the user so that we can troubleshoot that way (obviously this doesn't work if they're calling about an email problem, but whatever). They nearly always jump at it. Then I can polish off the user's problem between taking more calls and keeping my average call time down.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 08:33 pm (UTC)Don't feel bad...
Date: 2006-08-28 08:44 pm (UTC)2) I've got one hearing impaired user who REFUSES to call in tickets. OR get called back - even with Relay. She insists on e-mail contact only. It's a pain for getting things scheduled but it works. Deity help her if she ever has to put in a critical ticket though...
Re: Don't feel bad...
Date: 2006-08-28 08:53 pm (UTC)For whatever reason, I am his preferred contact. Possibly because when he *does* have to talk to me via relay, I'm pretty decent at it, and it doesn' bug me like it does a lot of folks.
Of course, very very early in my tech support career, I spent 3 hours and 5 relay techs troubleshooting a cable modem and email. *headdesk* It was *horrid.*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-28 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:39 am (UTC)sorry... to go phonetic for w and t, and then just use the word for the 'f'. Makes me laugh.
I wonder how bad the auditors would hit me if I used that version of 'f' for an ipconfig? *L*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 02:45 am (UTC)Like everyone else has already said though, I'm not upset about the person using the service, or the operator, just the inefficency of the whole thing. I've had a couple of people come through who were just amazing knew all the answers before I asked the questions or had the tty or whatever they were using in the same room as the computer they were having problems with. Then I've also had the callers where even the operators were wtf'ing and thanking us when we said we had to end the call for language or long wait times.
Everytime I think I have it bad in isp support, I know it could always be worse... relay has to be harder.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:17 am (UTC)And then I got in trouble for cutting and pasting the IM conversation into the ticket log. Hey, is it my fault the guy on the other end couldn't spell for beans? Source data is almost always better for record-keeping purposes than interpreted data, and I wasn't going to type the damn call out twice.