You're going to donate this? Seriously?
Oct. 14th, 2009 02:39 pmOkay, slightly befuddled older lady, sure we can format the drive in your old tower so you can donate it to some needy person.
Hey, wait a minute, this is an AT machine... that happens to be a 486 DX2 with 8MB of memory. Do you hate who you're donating it to THAT much? I don't think whoever you give this too is going to be able to use it for much in the way of modern computing. If you want to donate a cheap machine, then get a netbook.
Hey, wait a minute, this is an AT machine... that happens to be a 486 DX2 with 8MB of memory. Do you hate who you're donating it to THAT much? I don't think whoever you give this too is going to be able to use it for much in the way of modern computing. If you want to donate a cheap machine, then get a netbook.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 07:11 pm (UTC)--H
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:26 pm (UTC)It would play it, very, very well in fact. Probably better than the DOS-Box version provided for 15 dollars on Steam....
Number one game for many, many good reasons....
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 08:58 pm (UTC)You do realize that said machine is perfectly fine for doing things like, oh, resumes and similar word-processing so that the needy recipient can work to find a decently paying job in order to be able to afford a more recent-vintage machine if they desire it. And if they can get a basic net connection of some sort (not sure how many dialups are still around, and if you can afford decent broadband you can probably afford to save for a cheap pre-built these days), it also serves as a useful point-of-contact for those potential employers without having to rely on libraries and similar being open. (Granted, I'd rather go with plain telephone in that case, but some companies like e-mail contact as well.). Of course, MS no longer supports Win9x at all, or the older versions of IE, but if they can get it onto the machine (or for that matter, the Linux idea isn't that unreasonable, presuming that the machine will go through another, tech-savvy party to get to the needy) they'll have access to a web browser, providing them to even more capability to job-hunt. Yes, it won't handle all these flash-bloated pages that are around these days, but that's actually not that important when the alternative is nothing at all.
I swear, kids these days. The system requirements needed for practical computing and communication were surpassed a decade ago--the primary thing driving hardware upgrades these days is gaming. Take a look at most of the components in your current machine, and ask yourself 'If it weren't for wanting to play Game X, would I have needed to upgrade this?'.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:12 pm (UTC)Yeah, sure, you could slap a stripped down version of Linux on it, and it might run something resembling well enough to use. But there comes a time when stuff just needs to be scrapped. And for this machine, that was about 6 years ago at least. It's not like you can get serial port mice for it in a store anywhere.. or a parallel port inkjet, for that matter.
Personally, I wouldnt donate anything much older than a PII era system. Anything older than that would just be cruel and unusual punishment.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:18 pm (UTC)Also, you're a bit of a dick.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:29 pm (UTC)Serial mice--yeah, that'd be a problem if the one you were using broke, as even in 9x trying to navigate with just the keyboard was a pain. You might be surprised, though, what's floating around especially in donation-driven resale places. Not sure when they switched from serial to PS/2 on the 486s, either..I seem to remember using a PS/2 mouse on mine, but I could be wrong.
And as far as parallel-port inkjets...hmmm, I'm looking at my parallel port *LaserJet* sitting next to me that I got when my place of work ditched their office system in favor of a new vendor (B&W only, but hey, it's laser *and* I got 2 additional toner carts along with the nearly full one in the printer to begin with). And if you're really that much in need, I have seen the occasional dot-matrix still floating around--though that would be counterproductive to using the machine for resumes and such, as the quality's not that good compared to inkjet--and I *haven't* seen a daisy-wheel for ages.
As for the PII...that one, I could see as a potentially valid point--and kinda makes me wish I had some spare cases, power supplies, and smaller drives for the older gear I have sitting around so I could donate--then again, the place I'd be taking it to would rather have complete systems, and I *don't* have extra keyboards, monitors, or mice around. :-/
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:31 pm (UTC)The last time I did anything with a 486 was sometime in 2003 or so, and even THAT was just to prove a point - and all I did with the damn thing was run dhcpd on it headless.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:43 pm (UTC)I'm actually looking at putting some things on low power, fanless atom boxes for this very reason.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:44 pm (UTC)Hmmm-actually, you do bring up a very valid point that I overlooked initially--that 8MB of memory could certainly be an issue. I keep forgetting how much even the earlier Intel platforms hogged (I keep remembering what my Ami was capable of with only 8MB).
And yeah, the 'decade' figure was probably an overestimate, but not by a huge amount. It just makes me want to smack people upside the head (though not with a cane *quite* yet! ;-) ) when they come across with the attitude f 'It's worthless junk because it can't do the Latest Greatest Happy Shiny Thing!'. I've already seen that with people putting down single-core machines at all as being hopelessly obsolete, and a few (very few, fortunately, and they've pretty much obviously got cranial-rectal-inversion in general anyway) that are already declaring that about dual-cores. :-/
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:52 pm (UTC)And I hate to say this, but on a slow machine (P2 266 256MB), Win2000 ran faster than a customized flavor of Ubuntu.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 09:55 pm (UTC)You're pretty much on the other end of the spectrum of the kind of person that the box in the OP would be going to. I quite readily agree that it isn't a great machine, and if you're trying to do anything 'modern' with the massive bloat that entails you're SOL. But for someone with no computer at all, and insufficient income to get even a Eee box? Still useful (Though, I could see a problem with the memory amount, unfortunately. :-/ )
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 10:27 pm (UTC)It's not like people are dismissing something that could run Windows XP here - I think you've picked the wrong example to use to express what appears to be your pet hate of people dismissing older computers as useless.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 10:45 pm (UTC)