calm. the fuck. down.
Dec. 4th, 2007 01:09 pmOk, your personal computer being hacked is not a matter of national security. Yelling at us about our software's imperfections doesn't have an impact Vista's shortcomings. GTFO n00b and bother MS.
I suggest your company talks to McAfee about the McAfee crash and loss of its firewall on Vista and failures in security proven by the fact that more data has been UPLOADED from an apparently protected Vista computer than has been DOWNLOADED even when the user downloads several HUGE DVDs. It could be something to do with Google search hosted Chinese malware search entries that penetrate both Windows defender and McAfee FIREWALLs! or McAfee is playing funny games with my private data.
I suggest you STFU and stop wasting my time when this has nothing to do with our $20 anti-malware software. You weren't satisfied with the trial? Fine. Don't fucking buy it and uninstall it.
This is a very serious accusation - a national security threat! Google have acted promptly to stop the rogue search entries but Windows defender and McAfee are full of holes and the sense of security is so FALSE it is a big LIE! IE in protected mode on Vista is full of holes! Many National Defence Computers DoD and MOD use Vista - so I suggest you use clothes pegs and hang Microsoft and McAfee up by their ears untill they ACTUALLY CREATE A FIREWALL THAT PROTECTS BOTH WAYS - BOTH INCOMING AND OUTGOING DATA. Windows defender is outward looking firewall so a (Chinese) Trojan can operate from within and instigate a connection from inside- result connection through the firewall - A SECURITY LEAK BOTH WAYS. Does Microsoft know how bad that is?
I DON'T KNOW. ASK THEM? WE'RE ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORTING OUR SOFTWARE, YOU FUCKING ASSHAT.
I suggest your company talks to McAfee about the McAfee crash and loss of its firewall on Vista and failures in security proven by the fact that more data has been UPLOADED from an apparently protected Vista computer than has been DOWNLOADED even when the user downloads several HUGE DVDs. It could be something to do with Google search hosted Chinese malware search entries that penetrate both Windows defender and McAfee FIREWALLs! or McAfee is playing funny games with my private data.
I suggest you STFU and stop wasting my time when this has nothing to do with our $20 anti-malware software. You weren't satisfied with the trial? Fine. Don't fucking buy it and uninstall it.
This is a very serious accusation - a national security threat! Google have acted promptly to stop the rogue search entries but Windows defender and McAfee are full of holes and the sense of security is so FALSE it is a big LIE! IE in protected mode on Vista is full of holes! Many National Defence Computers DoD and MOD use Vista - so I suggest you use clothes pegs and hang Microsoft and McAfee up by their ears untill they ACTUALLY CREATE A FIREWALL THAT PROTECTS BOTH WAYS - BOTH INCOMING AND OUTGOING DATA. Windows defender is outward looking firewall so a (Chinese) Trojan can operate from within and instigate a connection from inside- result connection through the firewall - A SECURITY LEAK BOTH WAYS. Does Microsoft know how bad that is?
I DON'T KNOW. ASK THEM? WE'RE ONLY RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORTING OUR SOFTWARE, YOU FUCKING ASSHAT.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 06:29 pm (UTC)O RLY. I thought all they needed was a big red button that says "DO NOT PUSH". Did it not have enough chrome and eyecandy?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:03 pm (UTC)When I did my internship with the US attorney's office in my district around 3 years ago they were still using Windows 2000.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:28 pm (UTC)I would say more, but the guy who told me this couldn't say much more than that.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 09:11 pm (UTC)Too new
Date: 2007-12-05 02:22 am (UTC)And no, Vista is not certified for anything, mostly because it's new.
umm...
Date: 2007-12-05 02:26 am (UTC)that idiot has no idea how bittorrent works... and fails for admitting likely piracy...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-08 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-08 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 11:48 pm (UTC)/me wonders...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 12:02 am (UTC)But no, we get more mis-directed hate than Adobe unfortunately.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 12:22 am (UTC)/me was just trying to uninstall Reader 7.0 (I grabbed the installer with the least evil, IMO, a while ago because I had a LaTeX installer that required it), and it decided that it wasn't going to uninstall. But, unlike any /other/ uninstaller, which *stops* when it fails...it just sat there and incremented it's time-estimated display until I decided I'd rather edit my registry than deal with an installer that was convinced that it needed another 10 672 minutes. Yes, that's right. Ten-thousand six-hundred seventy-two minutes. One hundred seventy-eight hours. SEVEN AND AN HALF DAYS!
Adobe < Microsoft
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 12:51 am (UTC)But of course damn near everyone has that bloody thing installed now, because of Adobe. I take great pleasure in uninstalling it the moment I have the slightest excuse and I've yet to have a single person even notice it's gone.