One of the other helldesk monkeys just submitted a ticket:
Here is the Summary, in it's entirety:
Summary: Problem
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
Update: Now the summary reads: CHECK WORK LOG
::soul dies a little::
EndUpdate
Here is the Summary, in it's entirety:
Summary: Problem
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
::headdesk::
Update: Now the summary reads: CHECK WORK LOG
::soul dies a little::
EndUpdate
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 07:36 pm (UTC)much laughter and joking ensued. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 07:50 pm (UTC)however I am not planning on giving up my scotch any time soon.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-16 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:15 am (UTC)We should be able to have it in our taxes as a legitimate business expense!
I tried to argue with it when I was an author, citing many great artists throughout history, but it was a no go. :-(
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:58 am (UTC)or
"Fixed"
Either way...
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 04:13 am (UTC)Problem (badly spelled word salad) Please assist.
The management developed a "top ten" questions and was shocked when I told them that the Helldesk wasn't answering those questions - they had to type something, but they'd type "n/a, n/a, n/a" or grossly mischaracterize the ticket so it was a type where the q's didn't come up.
I'd suggest keeping a log of these problems - what ticket, who entered it, what general category the ticket issue fell in, what the problem was in the way the ticket was delivered, resolution, opportunities for training. (FAQs, knowledge base, etc.)
The Helldesk boss, and your competent techs who are tired of pulling the load, are allies in this. Get them on your side. Be constructive. If the Helldesk has a goal to answer X percent of calls on L1, say that this will help meet and exceed the goals (because now, obviously, all but two are being an answering service, and not a very good one at that - that's not really even up to Level 1).
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 08:09 am (UTC)Although, if it was done intentionally as an example, then it'd probably be alright.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-17 01:11 pm (UTC)