OK, this just beats all.
Jul. 10th, 2007 12:57 pmJust talked to someone who had two computers, both connecting to the Internet, but clearly not on the same subnet because their peer-peer services wouldn't see each other. I figured it was just a couple of stacked NAT routers .. but I was wrong.
One machine was connected through a cable modem via a wireless NAT router.
The other machine was directly connected to a DSL modem.
I can't figure out if she just didn't tell the DSL sales people she had another machine already on a cable connection with everything she needed to put that second machine on the LAN with the first one, or if she did and the jerks set her up with a separate DSL anyway just to make a few bucks off of her. Because it was painfully clear that this person was in about ten feet over her head even with basic navigation on either machine, and I'm willing to bet that she had *absolutely* no idea what she was doing when she set up the second machine. Or she has multiple relatives/friends with strong opinions about which type of Internet connection she should be using.
Needless to say, the DSL modem is now sitting there connected to DSL and no longer connected to either of her machines, which are both now happily chatting with each other on the private side of the NAT. I hope she calls the DSL provider and gives them a piece of her mind for selling her DSL when she clearly didn't need it .. or beats her "tech support" relatives about the ears a bit ..
One machine was connected through a cable modem via a wireless NAT router.
The other machine was directly connected to a DSL modem.
I can't figure out if she just didn't tell the DSL sales people she had another machine already on a cable connection with everything she needed to put that second machine on the LAN with the first one, or if she did and the jerks set her up with a separate DSL anyway just to make a few bucks off of her. Because it was painfully clear that this person was in about ten feet over her head even with basic navigation on either machine, and I'm willing to bet that she had *absolutely* no idea what she was doing when she set up the second machine. Or she has multiple relatives/friends with strong opinions about which type of Internet connection she should be using.
Needless to say, the DSL modem is now sitting there connected to DSL and no longer connected to either of her machines, which are both now happily chatting with each other on the private side of the NAT. I hope she calls the DSL provider and gives them a piece of her mind for selling her DSL when she clearly didn't need it .. or beats her "tech support" relatives about the ears a bit ..
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:24 pm (UTC)And don't get me started about "tech support" relatives.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 07:12 pm (UTC)But, yeah - letting a consumer box load-balance would be nice. Unless you have to support it. Can you imagine the buck passing? Sorry, it's your DSL provider - Sorry, it's your Cable provider - Sorry, it's your box manufacturer - Sorry, it's your laptop manufacturer - Sorry, it's your wireless card manufacturer, Sorry, it's your DSL provider...
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-11 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-11 05:59 pm (UTC)